News >> Browse Articles >> General Health

+2

FTC Warns Consumers About Bogus Cancer Cures

FTC Warns Consumers About Bogus Cancer Cures

Randolph E. Schmid / AP

September 21, 2008

WASHINGTON – The Federal Trade Commission charged five companies with making false and misleading claims for cancer cures and said Thursday that it has reached settlements with six others. “As long as products have been sold there has been somebody out there selling snake oil to consumers,” said Lydia Parnes, director of the FTC’s bureau of consumer protection.

She said the agency, along with the Food and Drug Administration and Canadian authorities, is launching a consumer education campaign warning about bogus claims for cures.

“There is no credible scientific evidence that any of the products marketed by these companies can prevent, cure, or treat cancer of any kind,” said Parnes.

The products the companies marketed include essiac teas and other herbal mixtures, laetrile, black salve — a corrosive ointment — and mushroom extracts.

Richard Jaffe, a Houston attorney who represents Native Essence Herb Company — one of those named by the FTC — argues that the government is trying to censor his client.

The company sells herbs over the internet and advises people that some herbs have a historical use for treatment of cancer and other medical conditions, he said. That is a truthful claim, he said, adding that because an herb was used by ancient Chinese or native Americans doesn’t mean it works, “which most people understand.”

In addition the agency wants to block reports on trials in other parts of the world, he said, because they might imply a claim.

“In our view it’s a battle between the right to speak and the government’s censorship,” Jaffe said.

Douglas Stearn of the FDA said his agency is concerned that people may forgo effective cancer treatments when choosing these products. In addition, he said, some of these unproven products may have dangerous interactions with other drugs.

“We would urge folks to talk to their doctors,” said Stearn.

Parnes said more than 100 warning letters were sent out and many advertisers dropped or changed their claims.

Of the complaints resolved by settlements, she said companies paid restitution ranging from $9,000 to $250,000.

The remaining five complaints of false and deceptive advertising will go before administrative law judges, she said.

Those cases are Omega Supply, San Diego, Calif.; Native Essence Herb Company, El Prado, N.M.; Daniel Chapter One, Portsmouth, R.I.; Gemtronics, Inc., Franklin, N.C., and Herbs for Cancer, Surprise, Ariz.

(c) YellowBrix 2008


+2
  • Green_sea_turtle_max50

    kstiltner1

    about 1 month ago

    1286 comments

    I would do whatever I had to do.

  • 1122071358_c3_af_1__max50

    casassy62688

    about 1 month ago

    262 comments

    If I had cancer, I would be trying everything in the world to beat it, no matter what. And I agree with Charlita, any patient afflicted by cancer would try everything they could find to get rid of it. But I also agree with laura59, any patient should be able to chose which method of treatment they want to recieve, if any at all, it's their life.

  • Nana_and_grandkids_minus_noah_max50

    charlita

    2 months ago

    2992 comments

    This is sad because this type of patient will try anything, grasp at any straw and so are vulnerable to these types of ads.But is there really a problem with them trying something different, unless they are abandoning conventional treatment altogether? It's the patient's right to be treated as they wish. We just need to make sure all the information available is valid so they can make an informed decision.

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    laura59

    2 months ago

    414 comments

    A person afflicted with cancer in any form, has the right to choose a method or methods of treatment. You better believe I would leave no stone unturned if I had it. Why would a person want a possible treatment or cure with something natural having no side effects when they can choose to have chemicals injected into their already ailing body? Are "education campaigns" going to lead to "re-education campaigns"? What, historically, good ever came from anything like this?

What's the Scoop?

Post a link to something interesting from another site, or submit your own original writing for the NursingLink community to read.

Report News Here

Recent Activity

Nurse_1__max30
StarlightRN commented on: "Pati Lorette", 15 minutes ago.
Kat_s_phone_104_-_copy_max30
angelkaty received a gift from PatiLorette, 17 minutes ago.
Nurse_1__max30
StarlightRN commented on: "Katherine Allen", 18 minutes ago.
Dscn1741_max30
snowbunnyRN received a gift from PatiLorette, 20 minutes ago.
Chris_hose__flowers_127_max30
mg1021 posted in: "YES WE DID!", 22 minutes ago.